The Church of England logoFaithWorshipLife eventsAbout the Church
Information Where to find us
Media Centre Home
Media

Countering Terrorism: Power, Violence and Democracy Post 9/11

19 September 2005

Churches have a vital role to play in combating the threat of terrorism, states a report from a working group of the Church of England’s House of Bishops, published today.

‘Countering Terrorism: Power, Violence and Democracy Post 9/11’ examines the issues around terrorism; international order and American power; and political reform and the Middle East; and sets out 13 Christian principles for addressing “a world characterised by power and violence.”

The 100-page report cites the “complex relationship between religion and violence” and the churches’ “tradition of self-examination and penitence” that “could make a distinctive contribution to the quest for reconciliation.”

It states: “Religion is now a major player on the public stage of the world in a way that few foresaw two decades ago. We believe that the churches have an important role to play, not simply in urging the importance and applicability of Christian principles, but in a proper awareness of the role of religion, for good as well as ill, and initiatives it might take towards reconciliation between adversaries.

“For the Church is called on both to be a witness to the Kingdom of God, which bears on relationships between states as well as individuals, but to be a sign of that kingdom, both in its own life and the role it plays in the international order.”

On terrorism, the Bishop of Oxford writes in the preface: “All governments have a proper responsibility to take the necessary steps to safeguard their citizens. People in Britain are acutely aware of this following the London bomb attacks of July 2005.

“But citizens need to be vigilant that these steps do not infringe hard won civil liberties, particularly the right to due process of law. The churches have a particular message here based on Biblical insights about fear and how playing on the fears of enemies makes for unwise policies.”

The report also examines the United States’ sense of ‘moral righteousness’ and questions the way some American Christians have used Biblical texts to support a political agenda in the Middle East. The bishops argue: “There is no uniquely righteous nation.  No country should see itself as the redeemer nation, singled out by God as part of his providential plan.”

The report calls for a strengthening of the United Nations as “the legitimate authority for military intervention” and opposes democracy being “imposed on any other country by force,” saying it must be adopted by a nation “in culturally appropriate ways.”

In a case study, annexed to the report, the authors examine the current controversy surrounding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While recognising the West’s legitimate security concerns the report suggests: “Tehran might forgo a nuclear weapons capability, if the EU-3 delivered a suitably attractive incentive package.”  The report thought it “disappointing” that “the EU-3 did not use the Framework Agreement to offer more security assurances.”

The authors also say that the arguments against nuclear proliferation need to be made more compelling. “If certain countries retain their nuclear weapons on the basis of the uncertainty and potentially violent volatility of international relations, on what basis are the same weapons denied to other states?”

They conclude: “The non-nuclear weapon states need to be presented with rather more convincing arguments and incentives than they have been up to now, as to why it might be in their best interests not to go nuclear.”

 

Notes

  • The working group, set up in October 2004, was comprised of: The Rt Revd Richard Harries, Bishop of Oxford (Chair); The Rt Revd Colin Bennetts, Bishop of Coventry; The Rt Revd Peter Selby, Bishop of Worcester; The Rt Revd Peter Price, Bishop of Bath and Wells.
  • The report was produced by the Working Group at the request of the House of Bishops.